An issue that I get asked a lot based on my technical analyses is a question of who works miracles boxer in mixed martial arts. When people ask us this what they normally want is designed for me to reaffirm the argument for either Junior dos Santos, Anderson Silva or Chip Diaz (or occasionally you'll see a hyper passionate Vitor Belfort fan).
These include the sort of questions I aren't keen on to answer for various reasons: the first being more and more fans of these fighters usually are so passionate about their chosen hero they will don't want to hear goal evaluation of their boxing competencies. The second is that it must be almost impossible to make direct comparisons within the truly elite boxers of MMA when they use such vastly vary type of styles.
Here, for scenario, is a list with possible criteria one could use to obtain a idea of just how good associated with a technical grasp someone has on boxing (aside from fundamental positions and movements). Beside each For certain i will give examples of well-known MMA fighters whose game each factor is particularly prominent in, and others who show very small aptitude or preference designed for said factor.
- Tie up whenever he likes to avoid punishment or smother an exchange that she is losing. (Fedor did this actually, Michael Bisping and Andrei Arlovski can not).
- Move his head or system off line or use up his opponent's hands as he is supplied in, to prevent the rival from simply punching back blindly and still finding the mark. (B. J. Penn was great only at that, Rashad Evans, Diego Sanchez, Takanori Gomi along with Frank Mir are not).
- Exit for a different angle from the line applications he entered, accompanied with head movement to evade probably the most likely counter. (Dominick Cruz is proficient at this, Vitor Belfort along with Nick Diaz are not).
: Use footwork, distancing and head movement to eliminate the opportunities for strikes, not always use his gloves and additionally forearms to block him or her. (Anderson Silva and Jr dos Santos are accomplished at this, Quinton 'Rampage' Jackson is not, though Stefan Struve might be the worst).
If a fighter is lifetime get in safely and find out safely, and not merely relying on reactions in addition to speed, he is doing a better job than most.
Even some very nice professional boxers can forget these basics. Ken Norton was in a position to beat Muhammad Ali up badly for their first bout because Ali found myself in the mindset that merely throwing his jab works because it had on every occasion before, rather than thinking about how he was going to step in without Norton merely throwing back a punch simultaneously in addition to landing.
Really the line between mediocre and fantastic, and good and wonderful, is one of discipline and the understanding that good boxing is usually something you perform in the fight, not something you be put into already having.
For example, it didn't matter that will Alistair Overeem had performed better against elite strikers than Antonio 'Bigfoot' Silva, Overeem acted that he was entitled for a win rather than being required to work for it and ducked into a punch for this efforts.
Now we'll jump on to aspects of boxing which will make a fighter a heightened boxer (or elite around MMA), but you will remember that every single name put forward as the best boxer inside MMA doesn't do these things. These are the factors that produce it pretty much impossible to examine a "best boxer" around MMA.
- Move laterally to help force the opponent to pivot to manage him, keeping them on your defensive and playing meet up with his feet rather than on the point of attack. (Anderson Silva side skipping within the cage is seen in all of the of his fights, while Junior Dos Santos fights almost entirely for the straight line as if he or she is fencing).
- Counter push and lead with matched aptitude, and often counter punch from a lead. Leading exclusively could make a fighter an simplier and easier target for counters, refusal to lead results in very slow fights with little to say one fighter is successful. (Dos Santos is are able of both, as is Chip Diaz, so was Cro Cop, while Anderson Silva leads very rarely and Vitor Belfort counters much less expensive than he rushes her opponents).
- Cut off the ring, use hooks to stop an opponent from running, and 'herd' his competition into punches. (Roy Nelson is quite good at this even though his single-punch game, Quinton Jackson once were very good at this approach, Nick Diaz is really poor at cutting up from the ring, Cro Cop has been awful at it inside his late career).
- Work effectively on the body, realising that it pays dividends later in the bout and is on a regular basis available in MMA. (Nick Diaz is actually impeccable at this, Dos Santos is excellent at using straights to the body to open upwards head shots as his opponents set out to lose the will to take the more body punches. Anderson Silva, Vitor Belfort and nearly everyone else in MMA can be almost exclusively head hunters making use of their punches).
- Can point with both his right hand and left palm. (Dos Santos, Silva and Fedor were brilliant at the, Michael Bisping is a brilliant example of a technical boxer that's predictable because he cannot lead with not his jab, Georges St. Pierre is much that same).
Ultimately, as you can observe, there are plenty of factors you can easily point to in a good fighter's game and express "damn, that's some fantastic boxing! " including plenty that i haven't even mentioned these for brevity's sake, but there are countless at play that people cannot accurately compare two fighters and developed a definitive best boxer inside MMA.
Obviously, this report won't stop the limitless debate, but hopefully with some more fans considering these requirements, we can start to move away from the ancient attitude that good punching equals good boxing.
More Info: A guard wounded in El Molinon after a confrontation with supporters of Sporting de Gijón
No comments:
Post a Comment